Inflammatory Acclamatories*

Jim Emerson, whose blog has been given a space separate from Roger Ebert’s, twice recently has addressed our cultural tendency to be lazy with language, particularly in marketing movies. First, he parses the MPAA’s explanatory descriptions of its ratings:

Bad Santa (R): ‘pervasive language, strong sexual content, and some violence.’ (Language is pervasive in Bad Santa.)”

Then, he breaks down some “critical acclaim” for movies and finds it neither critical nor ... err ... acclamatory*:

“Read it slowly, one word at a time. It says almost precisely nothing at all — and could be said (with conviction!) even by someone who has not seen the movie.”

* I made up both versions of that word.

Leave a comment

Latest Twitter Review

  • ‘(500) Days of Summer’ has a good hook and nails relationship details, but it’s too cute and frustratingly undisciplined and self-satisfied.
    > More Twitter updates

Recent Comments

  • I just watched the film today for the first time. Amazing experience, that’s for sure, especially reading about Roger Ebert’s finding and all the theories...
  • One can make a strong argument that he is the first cyber hero. this movie relates more and more to our daily lives with the...
  • Strange things happen all the time. This is the belief of the narrator. If we see it in a movie--or perhaps read it in a...
  • Seeing Is Not Believing In Magnolia, we witness a visible and cataclysmic act of God. But in a strange paradox, no one in the film—nor...
    Shane Hipps of Eric Horssius
    Why Are There Frogs Falling from the Sky?
  • 1) Why do men never want to have a relationship like women do? For example, in my opinion, women like to have companionship, sharing things...

I'm a LAMB

  • bt_assoc_grey.jpg
Close