Box Office Power Rankings: January 11-13, 2008

A few bits of bidness:

  • Yes, things have been awfully quiet around here. Since mid-December, I’ve done shit. Four reasons: holidays, holidays hangover, Short-Film Week burnout, and preparations for the impending Spawn of Culture Snob.
  • So yes, things will remain quiet around here.
  • Regarding last week’s inquiry: Atonement’s wider release still didn’t push it past 10th place in overall box office this past weekend. I hereby declare its release pattern a failure, mostly because it’s fun to cast aspersions at Atonement.

In this week’s Box Office Power Rankings, Juno retained her crown by outrunning a couple of old farts with cancer. Yeah, she’s pregnant, but that’s still not fair, is it?

Box Office Power Rankings: January 11-13
(Rank) Movie (last week; box office, per-theater, Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic: total)
(1) Juno (1; 8, 8, 10, 9: 35)
(2) The Bucket List (-; 10, 9, 6, 5: 30)
(3) Atonement (2; 1, 7, 9, 10: 27)
(4) First Sunday (-; 9, 10, 2, 4: 25)
(5) National Treasure: Book of Secrets (3; 7, 6, 5, 6: 24)
(6) I Am Legend (5; 5, 2, 8, 8: 23)
(7) The Pirates Who Don’t Do Anything: A VeggieTales Movie (-; 2, 5, 7, 7: 21)
(8) Alvin and the Chipmunks (7; 6, 4, 4, 3: 17)
(9) P.S. I Love You (10; 3, 1, 3, 2: 9)
(9) One Missed Call (9; 4, 3, 1, 1: 9)

Methodology

Culture Snob’s Box Office Power Rankings balance box office and critical reception to create a better measure of a movie’s overall performance against its peers.

The weekly rankings cover the 10 top-grossing movies in the United States for the previous weekend. We assign equal weight to box office and critical opinion, with each having two components. The measures are: box-office gross, per-theater average, Rotten Tomatoes score, and Metacritic score.

Why those four? Box-office gross basically measures the number of people who saw a movie in a given weekend. Per-theater average corrects for blockbuster-wannabes that flood the market with prints, and gives limited-release movies a fighting chance. Rotten Tomatoes measures critical opinion in a binary way. And Metacritic gives a better sense of critics’ enthusiasm (or bile) for a movie.

For each of the four measures, the movies are ranked and assigned points (10 for the best performer, one for the worst). Finally, those points are added up, with a maximum score of 40 and a minimum score of four.

1 Comment

I do wish more people would see Atonement, even so that it could be more widely discussed for it’s themetic material.

It certainly is getting the buzz though when it comes to magazine covers and images.

It’s so hard to tell what’ll really happen oscar nom morning, especially in regards to this film.

Leave a comment

Latest Twitter Review

  • 2005’s ‘Stay’ is too aggressively off, fostering sensitivity to its head game rather than engagement in the story. Gosling holds it together
    > More Twitter updates

Recent Comments

  • Nathan: I prefer to look at the text rather than what the creator intended, or what the creator intended originally. And regardless of direct references...
  • I just watched “Magnolia” for the first time, and in the daze afterwards I stumbled on this article. I found it very interesting, but after...
  • If anybody is still reading this, there is LITERALLY what to this naive viewer appears to be a smoking gun (as in, a gun with...
  • Thanks, Culture Snob, for this excellent series of Magnolia analysis. Last night I watched it again for the first time in ten years, having seen...
  • Great post. Very relevant five years later - when we went through the financial crisis. Again there was loads of indignation but very little understanding...
    Clifford Jackman
    No School for Scandal

Other Voices

I'm a LAMB

  • bt_assoc_grey.jpg
Close